‘It’s devastating’: the way 30 captive beluga whales are now pawns in dispute over inhumane treatment.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming little “sweetheart”. Orion – called “Onion Ring” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a wiggly creature. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a kind nature.
A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian amusement park have become pawns in a tussle between a shuttered park, public officials and welfare campaigners.
But those most familiar with the whales say the heated debate over their fate often fails to consider the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in confinement, have been closely studied by the people who work with them regularly.
After the national authorities disallowed the transfer of the belugas to a foreign facility, the controversial amusement park near Niagara Falls where they are held threatened to euthanize them unless the government pays for the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has refused that demand, placing the 30 whales in an ever more uncertain position.
Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals
Scientists say that belugas’ brain structure, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and social skills point to they are remarkably smart creatures – something a former trainer discovered personally.
She spent three years as a whale caretaker, a job that required earning the trust of the sea creatures.
“Developing those connections over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of care. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more vulnerable with you. It’s just so extraordinary and fulfilling.”
Burgess knew the whales were highly intelligent, but she says she was even so surprised by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their personalities. She formed a deep bond for two female belugas with opposing natures.
“Eve selected me. Cleo made me earn it,” she said. “They transformed the way I view bonding.”
Growing Opposition and Deteriorating Conditions
Burgess’s connection with the whales evolved against a background of increasing societal concern to their captivity.
During her time at the park, seven belugas and the park’s single orca, the orca, succumbed. In all, nineteen belugas have died at the park since recent years, a number which the facility links to age-related causes, but which advocates say points to the poor conditions in which they were kept.
The park did not open to the public over the recent season, but Burgess says she observed directly consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is falling apart from the tanks because they’re degrading and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with chunks in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”
The facility did not reply to a inquiry, but previously asserted: “The whales … get far superior health care and around the clock care than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”
Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions
The former employee was dismissed from the park in the spring following the passing of Eos, an ailing beluga the employees had to put down. She said the park suspected information of the incident were disclosed to the press and she was let go not long after.
The ambiguity over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and current and former trainers in distress. She says the park’s threat to end the lives of its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “practically unfeasible” endeavor, adding any efforts to humanely kill even a one beluga would require “significant personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.
“It’s impossible in hell the employees would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be removed immediately from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister turned down a request to transfer the whales to an overseas location.
“Granting the proposal would have meant a ongoing life in enclosure and a return to performance for audiences,” the minister stated. “As the public, we know that whales belong in the sea, not in enclosures for our amusement. I could not in good conscience approve an relocation that would perpetuate the treatment these belugas have experienced.”
But Burgess said the minister’s comments reflect a more general misunderstanding of the realities of living conditions for belugas raised in confinement.
“The people needs to realize these are whales that have spent their whole lives in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the remainder of their lives,” she said. “People just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘shut it down’.”
Sanctuary Proposal and Ongoing Debate
As authorities attempt to find a solution, suggestions have been put forward, some of which have minimal feasibility. One proposal called for the belugas to be let go into the open waters of the Arctic – where whales are a important part of food for Inuit communities.
A planned protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has been most controversial. The planned location, which includes a large area of penned in ocean, remains undeveloped. Supporters remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a long term resolution for eight of the whales.
But, the former trainer says, among trainers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an experiment” in the whales’ well-being.
Different voices say the possibility of a refuge indicates a broader global shift away from animal displays and could represent a viable approach in the short term.
Charles Vinick, leader of the plan, said the location will simulate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales obtain from caretakers, albeit in a more expansive space. He said after the well-being of whales is thoroughly evaluated, which could take months|an extended period|